#7779;) to Ḥaḍrat âAlī (âa) in this regard is quite interesting: âO âAlī! In the race for nearness to God, if you mount the horse of knowledge, learning and reflection, you will be ahead of everybody including those who hasten toward God by means of worship, prayer and fasting, and you will attain divine proximity.â5
2. The prophets (âa) and empirical sciences
To know and understand properly the positions of science and religion is so important for us. Alfred North Whitehead,6 a great mathematician and philosopher of the 20th century, says: âWhen we reflect on the value and importance of religion and science for mankind, it is not absurd to say that the future course of history depends on this generationâs treatment of the relationship between these two.â7
Before mentioning the different viewpoints on the relationship between science and religion, it is necessary to note that man is in need of religion as well as science. Any perspective on man not being in need of both religion and science is inconsistent with the reality of man. Throughout history, there have been those who have striven to observe natural phenomena and explain them based on religion and also search for the source of natural laws from the Bible.
Sometimes, contributions in this context were even treated unkindly. An illustrious example of these oppositions was the case of Galileo whose scientific theory that the sun was the center of the universeâin opposition to the then prevailing Ptolemaic geocentrismâwas strongly condemned by the ecclesiastical authority.
Under the pretext of religion, if we want to assume that human beings are not in need of empirical sciences and ignore their scientific efforts, it will bring nothing except darkness, ignorance and Bedouin life. Have not those who regard science thus in the name of religion read the Qurâan which invites us repeatedly to the study nature?
â
Say: Travel over the land and then observe how He has originated the creationâ8
âThere is indeed a sign in that (the life of the bees) for a people who reflect.â9
âIndeed in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day, there are signs for those who possess intellects.â10
Therefore, religion does not seek to replace or put an end to scientific theories. In fact, encouragement to learn the natural sciences is an integral part of correct religious teachings.
Regrettably though, by excessive reliance on science under the pretext of progress in empirical sciences, some have imposed restrictions on religion and regarded mankind as needless of religion in this age of scientific progress and development. Scientism has so much rubbed some of discernment that they have not only been deprived of proper understanding of religion and its role in their lives, but they have also lost sight of their object of worship (i.e. science as it must be known and its jurisdiction and limitations).
This notion that science is the panacea to all problems of humankind was at its peak during the Renaissance and the scientific revolution and even now some still believe in it.
According to this idea, anything that cannot be empirically tested is meaningless and has no truth-value. Hence, religious claims such as the existence of God, angels and the Resurrection are all claims devoid of any truth-value for they cannot be put to experiment. Accordingly, even if religion once had a role in the life of humanity, it had already played its role and its period has expired.
Of course, scientific empiricism is not that prominent at present. Natural scientists acknowledge that the foundations of the sciences are elements that cannot be empirically tested. They emphasize that many scientific principles are actually derived from religion. According to these scientists, by emphasizing the reality of nature, the inherent unity of its different facets, the possibility of discovering its laws, and the status or station of nature as a reflection of divine knowledge, it is religion which has provided the necessary points of departure for the formation of science in the life of humankind.11
Science is indebted to religion more than is imagined or generally accepted. It is religion which considers nature as a mirror to know God, encouraging and giving us hope to know Him and helping us in seeking knowledge at the threshold of religious civilizations.
âThose who remember Allah standing, sitting, and lying on their sides, and reflect on the creation of the heavens and the earth [and say], âOur Lord, You have not created this in vain! Immaculate are You!ââ12
âIndeed in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of night and day, and the ships that sail at sea with profit to men, and the water that Allah sends down from the skyâwith which He revives the earth after its death, and scatters therein every kind of animalâand the changing of the winds, and the clouds disposed between the sky and the earth, are surely signs for a people who apply reason.â13
Moreover, if ever mankind hoped that science would solve all human problems during the past two centuries, today it has fully realized that it has not only failed to solve all problems but rather it has brought about even more serious problems. Progress in physics has heightened universal concern about destructive nuclear wars. Advanced production technologies have created worry about rapid environmental destruction. Worse still, technology has caused apprehension that humanity is now exploiting the divine blessings (natural resources) that belong to the human race at a rate that will deplete these non-renewable reserves.
In any case, science is no more that âdeityâ that attracts scientists from all persuasions. Today, the need to pay closer attention to the role of religion in life and even its role in establishing scientific foundations and restrictions has been heeded and acknowledged by many scientists. As such, we must have a balanced view and understanding of the role and function of religion and science and place each of them in its own domain.
Notes:
1. - Sūrah Aḥzāb 33:21.
2. - Kanz al-âUmmāl, vol. 11, p. 420, ḥadīth 31969.
3. - Ibn Saâd, Ṭabaqāt, vol. 1, p. 192.
4. - Muṭahharī, Nubuwwat in Majmūâeh-ye Āthār, vol. 4, p. 36.
5. - Ibn Sīnā, Risālah Miârājiyyah, n. p.
6. - Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947): a British mathematician and metaphysician, and generally recognized as one of the greatest 20th-century philosophers. His collaboration with his former pupil, the British mathematician and philosopher Bertrand Russell, in writing the three-volume Principia Mathematica (1910-13) produced one of the worldâs greatest works on logic and mathematics. [Trans.]
7. - Quoted in Barbour, âIlm va Dīn, p. 13.
8. - Sūrah âAnkabūt 29:20.
9. - Sūrah Naḥl 16:69.
10. - Sūrah Āli âImrān 3:190-191, 193.
11. - For further information about this theory that the foundations of science are based upon religious teachings, see Michael Peterson, et al, âAql va Iâtiqād Dīnī [Reason and Religious Belief], trans. Aḥmad Narāqī and Ibrāhīm Sulṭānī, p. 383.
12. - Sūrah Āli âImrān 3:191.
13. - Sūrah Baqarah 2:164.